Data breaches have very quickly climbed the information security agenda and that includes the data breach threat posed by employees and IT professionals.
Now a new report says the insider problem is far worse than we had previously imagined. The Verizon Data Breach investigations report claims that 14% of breaches are due to insiders and that’s not counting the further 12% of breaches that come from IT itself.
Examining the motives of employees with malicious intent, the Verizon report identified two main reasons insiders choose to cause so much trouble:
- They are looking for financial gain, perhaps via selling confidential data; or
- It’s an act of revenge by disgruntled workers or angry ex-employees who still have network privileges.
On the other hand, CompTIA, an association representing the interests of IT resellers and managed service providers, has a far different point of view. It says more than half of all breaches – some 52% – are due to human error or malice, and the rest arise from technology mistakes. Research from the SANS Institute reaches the same conclusion – employee negligence is a huge source of data breaches. Social engineering is one such element, so this once again shows the importance of training employees in basic IT security.
According to CompTIA, technical solutions are not enough. IT vigilance is always necessary as too many organisations don’t even know there is an insider threat. Resigning yourself to the fact that the human error factor is a problem with no solution is neglectful, especially when it accounts for such a high percentage of breaches. Ultimately, employees are the strongest security layer. Of course, it is just as important to make sure all updates and patches are installed, firewalls are turned on and anti-malware is up to date.
Organisations also need to consider adding tools that can spot and stop data leakage amongst other breaches. Email security too is a top measure to take as many breaches and leaks come through or from the employee’s inbox.
What precautions can you take?
But what should an organisation do when users, whose roles require access to sensitive data, misuse that access? What precautions can they take to reduce both the risk of this happening, and the damage that can result from insider activity?
There is no single answer to these questions, and there is no silver bullet that can solve the problem. A layered approach that includes policy, procedure and technical solutions is the right approach to take. GFI Software has identified 10 precautions in particular that organisations should consider.
Background checks should be carried out on every employee joining the organisation, even more so if those employees will have access to privileged data. While not foolproof (Edward Snowden had security clearance) they can help to identify potential employees who may have a criminal record or had financial problems in the past. They may also uncover some details of their employment history that bear closer inspection and further checks.
Acceptable Use Policies (AUP) do more than simply define what users should and should not do on the Internet. They also define what is acceptable and unacceptable when using customer and business proprietary data. While it will not stop those with clear intent, it will warn employees that there are consequences if they are caught including disciplinary action and possibly dismissal.
The principal of least privilege states that users should only be granted the minimum amount of access necessary to complete their jobs. This should include both administrative privileges and access to data. By limiting access, the amount of damage an insider can cause is limited.
4.Review of Privileges
Users’ access to systems and data should be reviewed regularly to ensure that such access is appropriate and is also still required. As users change roles and responsibilities, any access they no longer need should be revoked.
5.Separation of Duties
When possible, administrative duties should be divided up so that at least two users are required for key access or administrative functions. When two users must be involved, any malicious or inappropriate access requires collusion, reducing the likelihood of inappropriate actions and increasing the likelihood of detection.
Many insider threats develop over time and may go undetected for months or years. Often boredom is a cause. One way to counter both problems and at the same time improve the skills and value of key employees, is to rotate users through different roles. Job rotation also increases the likelihood that inappropriate activities will be detected as the new role holder must by definition examine what the previous role holder was doing.
7.Mandatory Time Away
All users need a holiday, a break and time away to recharge. This is not only good for users, it’s good for the organisation. Just like job rotation, when a privileged user is on leave, another person must cover their duties and has the opportunity to review what has been done.
8.Auditing and Log Review
Auditing is imperative. All actions and access must be audited, both for successes and failures. You will want to investigate failures as they may indicate attempts to access data, but you will also want to review successes and ensure that they are in support of appropriate actions, rather than inappropriate ones. While log review only detects things “after the fact”, they can detect repetitive or chronic actions early, and hopefully before too much damage is done.
9.Data Loss Protection
Data Loss Protection (DLP) technologies cannot prevent a determined attacker from taking data, but it can prevent many of the accidental data leakages that can occur.
Endpoint protection technologies can greatly reduce the risk of data loss and also detect inappropriate activities by privileged users. Endpoint protection can help you secure BYOD devices, and search files for key data like account numbers. The technology also helps to enforce policies that restrict users from transferring data to unapproved USB devices and encrypt those devices that are approved.
Insider threats can be prevented if a detailed and layered strategy is adopted. Every organisation needs HR, legal and IT to work together to cast a protective net that will proactively identify threats or at least minimise the impact of insider threat. No organisation is safe but we can all lower the risk by acknowledging that the problem exists and taking a range of simple precautions.
- Mobile malware threat “negligible” but pressure is on to respond faster as verticals targeted: Verizon
- Verizon: there is no Android malware problem, except for adware
- Is your Board Cyber Ready?
- Can funding open source bug bounties save Europe from mass-surveillance?
- Privacy Act's first year fosters new openness and promotes new levels of accountability.
- Budget 2015: ASIO flags encryption challenges, slams “malicious insiders” as A-G stumps $131.3m for metadata
- The true cost of a data breach
- How firewall load-balancing optimises security functions in the DMZ
- Australian executives more concerned, engaged with email security issues than overseas peers: Mimecast
- VARs partnering on technological security skills gap but social skills gap proving harder to fix