MPs and staff visited 'porn' websites 300,000 times during 2012, figures reveal

Legitimate research or an abuse of Parliamentary network?

The House of Commons Parliamentary network is recording thousands of attempts to reach pornographic websites each month by MPs, Lords and parliamentary staff, a Freedom of Information (FoI) request has discovered.

According to figures published by the Huffington Post UK, in the 12 months to July 2013 the network's system filtered nearly 300,000 such requests, with an extraordinary peak of 115,000 in November 2012 alone.

There were huge variations in the number reported for some months - only 15 in February 2013 for instance - which suggests that some of the fluctuation is probably explained by the way the unidentified filtering software records accesses rather than realtime usage.

The House of Commons was not willing to specify which system it is using and so it's impossible to speculate on the definition of porn it might be applying. Commercial systems typically use a mixture of industry block lists and vendor-specific collections; one of the most extensive is reckoned to be Huawei's ISP-level system used by Talk Talk as a model for Prime Minister David Cameron's controversial UK 'pornwall'.

It's also not clear whether the system employed actually blocks the accesses it records or simply notes that they have happened. A spokeswoman for the House of Commons told the Huffington Post that the numbers could have been inflated by pop-ups, embedded videos and links, and refreshes.

Furthermore, "we are not going to restrict Parliamentarians' ability to carry out research," the spokeswoman said.

Research is a valid defence, the exception being when a site being accessed breaches legality or downloads (including malware) are involved. There are also other types of problem content such as extremist websites MPs and their staff can reasonably claim to be within their remit to visit.

Malware was probably a small threat from such surfing, suggested Tripwire's director of risk and strategy, Tim Erlin.

"Attackers will always follow the better target. People viewing pornography tend are already more likely to be careful, and less likely to share what they've found than those viewing religious or political websites. Today, you're more likely to be infected with malware from a variety of other types of websites than pornography," he said.

More advanced network monitoring systems record which sites are being visited at an individual level, using that surveillance as a deterrent against abuses. That is one dimension missing from the figures, which reveal the number of accesses but not who made them or when.

Join the newsletter!


Sign up to gain exclusive access to email subscriptions, event invitations, competitions, giveaways, and much more.

Membership is free, and your security and privacy remain protected. View our privacy policy before signing up.

Error: Please check your email address.
Follow our new CSO Australia LinkedIn
Follow our new social and we'll keep you in the loop for exclusive events and all things security!
Have an opinion on security? Want to have your articles published on CSO? Please contact CSO Content Manager for our guidelines.

Tags Personal TechParliament

More about HuaweiTripwire

Show Comments

Featured Whitepapers

Editor's Recommendations

Brand Page

Stories by John E Dunn

Latest Videos

More videos

Blog Posts