The Information Commissioner's Office (ICO) has written to Google about its Street View project, following the publication of a damning Federal Communications Commission (FCC) report.
According to the FFC report, Google recently admitted for the first time that a single US-based British employee named "Engineer Doe" designed the Street View software from day one (in 2006) to 'wardrive' access point data such as SSIDs and MAC addresses but also harvest personal emails and user passwords from Wi-Fi access points not using encryption.
In the UK, the ICO announced in July 2010 that it did not believe that Street View collected personal data that could be linked to an individual based on the samples it was given access to by Google.
However, after reading the FCC report, the ICO has written to Google's senior vice-president, Alan Eustace to notify the company of its plans to reopen the investigation.
"During the course of our [initial] investigation, we were specifically told by Google that it was a simple mistake and if the data was collected deliberately then it is clear that this is a different situation than was reported to us in April 2010.
"Given the findings of the FCC, we have reopened our investigation," Steve Eckersley, head of enforcement at the ICO, wrote.
The ICO is now requesting that Google provides a range of information, including an exact list of what type of personal data was collected in the UK, and details about what technological or organisational measures were introduced to limit further data collection before the company admitted it was happening in May 2010.
It has also asked Google for copies of the original and subsequent versions of the software design document, as well as copies of the certificate of destruction related to the captured personal data.
Google has also faced calls in the US for the Department of Justice (DoJ) to re-open its own investigation into the affair at a time it Street View remains under investigation in several other countries."We have always been clear that the leaders of this project did not want or intend to use this payload data," a Google spokesperson was quoted as saying in response. "Indeed, Google never used it in any of our products or services."
"If people don't understand what is happening to their personal information, how can they make an informed choice about using a service? Google is putting advertiser's interests before user privacy and should not be rushing ahead before the public understand what the changes will mean," the organisation said.
Street View remains one of the most contentious projects Google has ever undertaken, hugely popular with users but also hugely resented by privacy campaigners the world over. At times, the system has courted abusurdity even in its basic function, inadvertently photographing ordinary people in embarrassing street situations.