Survey: Trust in certificates 'near breaking point'

Half of all security professionals believe that trust in keys and certificates is in jeopardy, according to a new study of 2,300 information security professionals released today by the Ponemon Institute and Venafi.

According to the report, there's been a steady stream of incidents recently involving stolen keys and certificates.

For example, last summer, Russian cybercriminals stole an SSL/TLS certificate from a top-five global bank, which helped them impersonate the bank and steal 80 million customer records.

Another SSL/TLS key and certificate allowed hackers to steal data from 4.5 million healthcare patients.

And as part of the Flame malware attack, Microsoft's software update service was spoofed by exploiting MD5-based signatures.

"Every single enterprise that we surveyed had multiple attacks on their keys and certificates over the past two years," said Kevin Bocek, VP of security strategy and threat Intelligence at Salt Lake City-based Venafi.

"It's not just happening to Sony, it's happening to everyone," he added.

He was referring to the recent Sony breach, in which keys and certificates were among the haul collected by the attackers and weren't revoked for weeks after the attack.

The level of worry about certificates is up from the previous study, when it was at 45 percent.

Beyond the steady stream of news reports, there are other reasons why information security professionals are worried about keys and certificates.

One is that 54 percent of the respondents said they don't know where all the keys and certificates are, or how many of them are in use. This is up from 50 percent two years ago.

Meanwhile, the total number of keys and certificates used by the average enterprise is 24,000 -- up 34 percent from 17,000 two years ago.

"We've got a pretty big surface area for attack then, and a pretty big potential for risk," said Bocek.

The coming Cryptoapocalypse

One surprising finding of this year's report, was that while respondents actually faced more man-in-the-middle than any other kind of certificate-based attacks, they were most worried about attackers being able to break encryption.

The average organization saw 1.4 man-in-the-middle attacks over the past two years, followed by 1.2 attacks based on weak cryptography, 0.4 attacks based on enterprise mobility certificate misuse, 0.4 attacks based on code-signing certificate misuse, 0.3 attacks based on SSH key misuse, and 0.3 attacks based on server certificate misuse.

But man-in-the-middle attacks came in fourth when respondents were asked about their worries for the next two years, after code-signing and enterprise mobility certificate misuse.

One reason that worries about the cryptography ranked highest could be because of a Black Hat conference presentation, said Bocek.

"It was a session on the probability that on any day, the cryptographic algorithms that we rely on would be broken," he said.

Enterprises would be faced with not just updating all their encryption with longer keys, but going out and replacing all the keys and certificates already in use.

For example, there are still enterprises using MD5-signed digital certificates.

A couple of years ago, it was risky but reasonably acceptable -- the cost to crack one was $200,000 when using Amazon AWS. Today, that cost is down to 65 cents.

"MD5, if you're using them, is a clear and present danger to your business," said Bocek.

About 1 percent of the certificates out on the Internet are MD5 certificates, but within enterprises that number is as high as 20 percent, he said.

Majority of companies are using SHA-1, he added, and there are estimates that it could be possible to put together a system for a couple of hundred thousand dollars to crack it.

The recommendation today is to use SHA-2, which has hash values of 224 to 512 bits, compared to SHA-1's 160 bits.

So far, there have been no demonstrations of SHA-2 decryption, Bocek said. "And that's a good thing."

But that doesn't mean that some smart mathematicians won't come up with something in the future, he added.

The combination of increased computation power and clever new attack strategies that could bring about the cryptocalypse, he said.

"We're facing a bit of an arms race," he said.

According to the respondents, an attack based on cryptographic exploits would cost an average of $114 million per enterprise.

It came in second, after $126 million impact for an attack based on enterprise mobility certificates.

However, when the probability of attack was factored in, respondents put the total risk of a cryptographic attack at $22 million, and mobility at $11 million.

The total risk of key and certificate-based attacks was $53 million per organization -- up 51 percent from 2013.

Join the CSO newsletter!

Error: Please check your email address.

Tags MicrosoftsecuritylegalPonemon Institutesonyvenafiintelmalwarecybercrime

More about AWSMicrosoftSonySSHVenafi

Show Comments

Featured Whitepapers

Editor's Recommendations

Solution Centres

Stories by Maria Korolov

Latest Videos

  • 150x50

    CSO Webinar: Will your data protection strategy be enough when disaster strikes?

    Speakers: - Paul O’Connor, Engagement leader - Performance Audit Group, Victorian Auditor-General’s Office (VAGO) - Nigel Phair, Managing Director, Centre for Internet Safety - Joshua Stenhouse, Technical Evangelist, Zerto - Anthony Caruana, CSO MC & Moderator

    Play Video

  • 150x50

    CSO Webinar: The Human Factor - Your people are your biggest security weakness

    ​Speakers: David Lacey, Researcher and former CISO Royal Mail David Turner - Global Risk Management Expert Mark Guntrip - Group Manager, Email Protection, Proofpoint

    Play Video

  • 150x50

    CSO Webinar: Current ransomware defences are failing – but machine learning can drive a more proactive solution

    Speakers • Ty Miller, Director, Threat Intelligence • Mark Gregory, Leader, Network Engineering Research Group, RMIT • Jeff Lanza, Retired FBI Agent (USA) • Andy Solterbeck, VP Asia Pacific, Cylance • David Braue, CSO MC/Moderator What to expect: ​Hear from industry experts on the local and global ransomware threat landscape. Explore a new approach to dealing with ransomware using machine-learning techniques and by thinking about the problem in a fundamentally different way. Apply techniques for gathering insight into ransomware behaviour and find out what elements must go into a truly effective ransomware defence. Get a first-hand look at how ransomware actually works in practice, and how machine-learning techniques can pick up on its activities long before your employees do.

    Play Video

  • 150x50

    CSO Webinar: Get real about metadata to avoid a false sense of security

    Speakers: • Anthony Caruana – CSO MC and moderator • Ian Farquhar, Worldwide Virtual Security Team Lead, Gigamon • John Lindsay, Former CTO, iiNet • Skeeve Stevens, Futurist, Future Sumo • David Vaile - Vice chair of APF, Co-Convenor of the Cyberspace Law And Policy Community, UNSW Law Faculty This webinar covers: - A 101 on metadata - what it is and how to use it - Insight into a typical attack, what happens and what we would find when looking into the metadata - How to collect metadata, use this to detect attacks and get greater insight into how you can use this to protect your organisation - Learn how much raw data and metadata to retain and how long for - Get a reality check on how you're using your metadata and if this is enough to secure your organisation

    Play Video

  • 150x50

    CSO Webinar: How banking trojans work and how you can stop them

    CSO Webinar: How banking trojans work and how you can stop them Featuring: • John Baird, Director of Global Technology Production, Deutsche Bank • Samantha Macleod, GM Cyber Security, ME Bank • Sherrod DeGrippo, Director of Emerging Threats, Proofpoint (USA)

    Play Video

More videos

Blog Posts

Market Place