Google Wallet Security Concerns Raised

Security firm Zvelo has discovered that the Google Wallet PIN can be cracked via an exhaustive numerical search.

Google's new NFC system that purports to turn your phone into a credit card can be compromised using a brute-force attack -- and that raises questions about its security.

Security firm Zvelo has discovered that the Google Wallet PIN, which is required of users to confirm purchases made with their phones, can be cracked via an exhaustive numerical search. Being able to access the PIN would allow criminals to use a Google Wallet-enabled phone to make purchases.

Because they're in the security business, Zvelo disclosed the issue to Google, which has confirmed that the vulnerability exists, and has "agreed to work quickly to resolve it."

Google Wallet is the first publicly available Near Field Communication (NFC) payment service in the U.S., and it's only available on one phone, on one network -- the Samsung Galaxy Nexus S 4G on Sprint.

NFC payment systems let users pay for items in brick-and-mortar retail stores by tapping their NFC-enabled device on a PayPass reader, or a small electronic box. NFC isn't limited to smartphones -- Google Wallet is partnered with MasterCard, which has been using NFC chips in some of its credit cards for several years, and which originally developed the PayPass reader.

There have been some questions about NFC security, and other wireless providers, such as AT&T, Verizon, and T-Mobile, currently do not allow the Google Wallet app on their smartphones. (Though this is probably because they're working on developing their own NFC payment system.)

However, because the Verizon Samsung Galaxy Nexus has NFC technology built-in, it is possible to install the Google Wallet app on that phone.

As for the security issue, it turns out that Google Wallet PIN information is stored on the phone itself, rather than on the NFC chip, and is therefore not terribly secure.

"Knowing that the PIN can only be a 4-digit numeric value, it dawned on us that a brute-force attack would only require calculating, at most, 10,000 SHA256 hashes," Zvelo Senior Engineer Joshua Rubin wrote in a blog post. SHA refers to Secure Hash Algorithm, which is one of a number of cryptographic hash functions. "This is trivial even on a platform as limited as a smartphone."

Rubin says that while Google Wallet only allows five invalid PIN entry attempts before shutting you out of the phone, this attack can reveal the PIN without a single invalid attempt.

According to Zvelo, the only way to fix the problem is to move the PIN verification to Secure Device (SE), or the NFC chip. The reason this is sort of a big deal is that it may require banks -- instead of Google -- to be responsible for PIN security (and perhaps they should be). Banks might have to follow their own policies for ATM PIN security, which, as Zvelo points out, receive a great deal of scrutiny.

Now for the good news: you don't need to worry about this unless you rooted your phone. If you did root your phone, you should be okay if you take some extra security steps -- set your phone's lock screen, and don't lose your phone.

Follow Sarah on Twitter, Facebook, or Google+.

Tags: at&t, Google, online security, samsung, security, t-mobile, verizon

Comments

1

Allen

Tue 21/02/2012 - 17:13

For my Android mobile i use COMODO mobile security which is working fine for me.
check out this : http://bit.ly/yBPF1C

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Users posting comments agree to the CSO comments policy.
Login or register to link comments to your user profile, or you may also post a comment without being logged in.
CSO Corporate Partners
  • FirEye
  • Clear Swift
  • Trend Micro
  • Sophos
  • NetIQ
rhs_login_lockGet exclusive access to CSO, invitation only events, reports & analysis.
CSO Directory

Trend Micro Mobile Security

Comprehensive enterprise protection for mobile devices

Security Awareness Tip
Software security company www.clearswift.com gives some advice this holiday season to make sure employees don’t end up on Santa’s naughty list!


At a fundamental business level, social media is a useful additional tool for communicating and collaborating with customers, colleagues and new business prospects. From an HR point of view, the social web is not only useful for recruitment but also as a knowledge network. At an employee level, social media is changing the way we work: Employees increasingly expect to be able to access personal technology and services in the workplace. As the lines between work and home life blur, staff are looking for greater flexibility in their roles; working from home is an increasing trend, but so too is ‘home-ing from work’, where staff expect to be able to perform personal tasks at work.

But social media brings risk and reward to business in equal measure. Information security is a key concern: Many organisations view social media channels as yet another route along which sensitive data can escape from the business, whether accidentally or maliciously. On top of this, senior management may be concerned about the amount of time employees spend on social networks.

This cultural shift raises new questions about trust in the workplace, the balance of power in employer / employee relationship and levels of control over people and content.


Organisations using content and web security technology can manage the way their staff use email and the internet without having to resort to a default position of mistrust. With a whopping third of ANZ employers completely blocking social media access at work, there’s a real danger of throwing the benefits of collaboration out with the risks.


It doesn’t have to be that way.

Trust breeds responsibility: People underestimate the amount of company time they spend on personal browsing. Allow staff to view their own web usage and foster more responsible behaviour without undermining trust.


Know limits: Set clear limits on personal surfing and communicate them to users. Alert them when they are approaching their limit. Help your people to play by the rules.


Share the load: Spread responsibility for usage reporting among managers and department heads so everyone gets to see how their usage impacts on the rest of the organisation. This also gives managers greater control and visibility into usage.


Need to know: Yes, you need reports and visibility. What you don’t need is employee data becoming common knowledge. Access control means reporting can be adjusted on a need-to-know basis.


Security ABC Guides

7 Ways to Protect Your Business Printers

Can a hacker burn down your business by remotely setting one of your printers on fire? Researchers at Columbia University have recently proposed such a scenario, although HP quickly denied that it's possible. However, even if your printers can't be used as remote firestarters, there are many risks involved in networking a printer.