DDoS attacks motivated by politics not criminality, Arbor Networks finds

Large service providers fear the Anonymous

Large Internet organisations believe ideological and political motivations have become the single commonest motivation behind the +Arbor+Networks+Security+Blog%29, a survey of major Internet firms by has found.

As expected, Arbor Networks' annual Infrastructure Security Report survey of 114 tier 1 Internet infrastructure firms, hosting companies and large enterprises found that DDoS attack size has edged up between 2010 and 2011, with 13 percent now reporting attacks sizes above 10Gbps.

If this is a levelling off on the attack sizes increases seen in previous year that probably has to do with attackers having found a sweet spot that overwhelms most defences without the need to grow larger still.

Nine out of ten said they'd seen at least one DDoS attack per month, up from about three quarters in 2010. Forty-four percent experienced 10 or more attacks per month, also up from the 35 percent mark.

A rising proportion of DDoS is now application-layer attacks while volumetric packet attacks have probably passed their zenith.

The surprise was the low ranking accorded to traditional extortion-related and competitive/business attacks, cited as a motivation only 18 and 19 percent of the time respectively, far behind 'political and ideological' which topped the anxiety table at 35 percent. 'Vandalism' came second on 31 percent.

This is an important development for large firms because ideological attackers are unlikely to cease DDoS after an objective has been achieved; fending off small groups of determined attackers on a more or less continuous basis could be the new normal.

"We think that what's changed is the speed at which companies can be targeted," said Arbor's EMEA solutions architect, Darren Anstee.

"It is not just the things [a company does] but the fact they are in a supply chain or a certain country," he said explaining what could turn an organisation into a target for ideologically-motivated DDoS.

The number of vendors reporting that a DDoS had taken down a firewall or Intrusion Prevention system was hardly changed year on year at the 40 percent mark.

Separately, DDoS defence vendor Prolexic published its Q4 2011 attack report, finding a shift to application layer DDoS and an average attack bandwidth of 5.2Gbps. Attack duration has dropped to 34 hours but this was offset by a large rise in packet-per second volume.

"Based on fourth quarter statistics, Prolexic predicts that 2012 will feature DDoS attacks that will be shorter in duration, but much more devastating in terms of packet-per-second volume," said Prolexic CTO, Paul Sop.

"Think of it this way. In the past, attackers had a rifle. In 2012, they have a machine gun with a laser site." Prolexic predicted this increase in PPS volume in its previous attack report and noted that attackers were changing their strategy.

Tags: arbor networks, Configuration / maintenance, data centre, hardware systems, security

Comments

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Users posting comments agree to the CSO comments policy.
Login or register to link comments to your user profile, or you may also post a comment without being logged in.
CSO Corporate Partners
  • FirEye
  • Clear Swift
  • Trend Micro
  • Sophos
  • NetIQ
rhs_login_lockGet exclusive access to CSO, invitation only events, reports & analysis.
CSO Directory

Identity & Access Management

Why choose NetIQ for Identity and Access Management

Security Awareness Tip
Software security company www.clearswift.com gives some advice this holiday season to make sure employees don’t end up on Santa’s naughty list!


At a fundamental business level, social media is a useful additional tool for communicating and collaborating with customers, colleagues and new business prospects. From an HR point of view, the social web is not only useful for recruitment but also as a knowledge network. At an employee level, social media is changing the way we work: Employees increasingly expect to be able to access personal technology and services in the workplace. As the lines between work and home life blur, staff are looking for greater flexibility in their roles; working from home is an increasing trend, but so too is ‘home-ing from work’, where staff expect to be able to perform personal tasks at work.

But social media brings risk and reward to business in equal measure. Information security is a key concern: Many organisations view social media channels as yet another route along which sensitive data can escape from the business, whether accidentally or maliciously. On top of this, senior management may be concerned about the amount of time employees spend on social networks.

This cultural shift raises new questions about trust in the workplace, the balance of power in employer / employee relationship and levels of control over people and content.


Organisations using content and web security technology can manage the way their staff use email and the internet without having to resort to a default position of mistrust. With a whopping third of ANZ employers completely blocking social media access at work, there’s a real danger of throwing the benefits of collaboration out with the risks.


It doesn’t have to be that way.

Trust breeds responsibility: People underestimate the amount of company time they spend on personal browsing. Allow staff to view their own web usage and foster more responsible behaviour without undermining trust.


Know limits: Set clear limits on personal surfing and communicate them to users. Alert them when they are approaching their limit. Help your people to play by the rules.


Share the load: Spread responsibility for usage reporting among managers and department heads so everyone gets to see how their usage impacts on the rest of the organisation. This also gives managers greater control and visibility into usage.


Need to know: Yes, you need reports and visibility. What you don’t need is employee data becoming common knowledge. Access control means reporting can be adjusted on a need-to-know basis.


Security ABC Guides

7 Ways to Protect Your Business Printers

Can a hacker burn down your business by remotely setting one of your printers on fire? Researchers at Columbia University have recently proposed such a scenario, although HP quickly denied that it's possible. However, even if your printers can't be used as remote firestarters, there are many risks involved in networking a printer.