2011, the year of the DDoS?

Attacks on LulzSec small-fry compared with hits on Russian bloggers, according to one content delivery network.

Attacks on LulzSec small-fry compared with hits on Russian bloggers, according to one content delivery network.

There was a 700 per cent increase in the number of DDoS attacks in second half of 2011, according to content delivery service, CloudFlare.

CloudFlare’s CEO, Matthew Prince, speculates the two main motivations for attacks on its clients were extortion and an eclectic set of political reasons.

“Recent attacks we've seen in this category include those aimed at journalists covering human rights abuses in Angola, bloggers writing about alleged election fraud in Russia, escort sites in Turkey, and sites offering surrogate mother services in China,” Prince wrote on the company’s blog.

CloudFlare’s DDoS protection service was earlier this year was busy fending off attacks against LulzSec, but ‘hacktivists’ and their detractors had nothing on whoever is behind attacks on Russia’s political bloggers that claim alleged fraud in the country.

“The attacks we saw directed at LulzSecurity.com were minor compared with some we see now against certain sites,” said Prince.

“The ones launched against Russian bloggers covering the alleged election fraud, for instance, have been massive.”

The other classic target are e-commerce sites, characterised by Prince as those with over US$1 million in monthly revenue. DDoS attacks were typically preceded by an extortion letter.

Prince claimed its figures were not skewed by its service attracting high-risk customers, and although conceding the rise might not be as steep, he insisted attacks were on the rise.  

Fellow DDoS protection service Prolexic also reported a 400 per cent year on year rise in the number of attacks since the third quarter of 2010. 

It too claims the size of attacks are increasing and claimed to have helped a Chinese client weather a seven day assault in November that reached, at its peak, 45Gbps of attack traffic. The average size of an attack was about 1.4Gbps.

Arbor Networks, which monitors DDoS activity via its Atlas network, shows there were 675 DDoS attacks in the past 24 hours. The largest three sources were China, South Korea and Great Britain, while those experiencing the highest number of attacks were the US, China and Brazil. The most common attack was TCP SYN flooding.

 

Tags: arbor networks, CloudFlare, DDoS attacks, DDos Protection service, LulzSec, Lulzsecurity, Prolexic

Comments

1

Christopher Jost

Sat 24/12/2011 - 02:40

It's worth noting that Arbor is tracking a lot of attack traffic originating from China however, the command and control nodes (and hence the ultimate source of the attacks) are in the US and the EU.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Users posting comments agree to the CSO comments policy.
Login or register to link comments to your user profile, or you may also post a comment without being logged in.
CSO Corporate Partners
  • FirEye
  • Clear Swift
  • Trend Micro
  • Sophos
  • NetIQ
rhs_login_lockGet exclusive access to CSO, invitation only events, reports & analysis.
CSO Directory

Fraud Management Solutions

Reduce fraud losses regardless of channel by preventing cybercrime, identity theft, and other threats targeting your customers.

Security Awareness Tip
Software security company www.clearswift.com gives some advice this holiday season to make sure employees don’t end up on Santa’s naughty list!


At a fundamental business level, social media is a useful additional tool for communicating and collaborating with customers, colleagues and new business prospects. From an HR point of view, the social web is not only useful for recruitment but also as a knowledge network. At an employee level, social media is changing the way we work: Employees increasingly expect to be able to access personal technology and services in the workplace. As the lines between work and home life blur, staff are looking for greater flexibility in their roles; working from home is an increasing trend, but so too is ‘home-ing from work’, where staff expect to be able to perform personal tasks at work.

But social media brings risk and reward to business in equal measure. Information security is a key concern: Many organisations view social media channels as yet another route along which sensitive data can escape from the business, whether accidentally or maliciously. On top of this, senior management may be concerned about the amount of time employees spend on social networks.

This cultural shift raises new questions about trust in the workplace, the balance of power in employer / employee relationship and levels of control over people and content.


Organisations using content and web security technology can manage the way their staff use email and the internet without having to resort to a default position of mistrust. With a whopping third of ANZ employers completely blocking social media access at work, there’s a real danger of throwing the benefits of collaboration out with the risks.


It doesn’t have to be that way.

Trust breeds responsibility: People underestimate the amount of company time they spend on personal browsing. Allow staff to view their own web usage and foster more responsible behaviour without undermining trust.


Know limits: Set clear limits on personal surfing and communicate them to users. Alert them when they are approaching their limit. Help your people to play by the rules.


Share the load: Spread responsibility for usage reporting among managers and department heads so everyone gets to see how their usage impacts on the rest of the organisation. This also gives managers greater control and visibility into usage.


Need to know: Yes, you need reports and visibility. What you don’t need is employee data becoming common knowledge. Access control means reporting can be adjusted on a need-to-know basis.


Security ABC Guides

7 Ways to Protect Your Business Printers

Can a hacker burn down your business by remotely setting one of your printers on fire? Researchers at Columbia University have recently proposed such a scenario, although HP quickly denied that it's possible. However, even if your printers can't be used as remote firestarters, there are many risks involved in networking a printer.