Want government cloud? Rethink security!

Welcome to mixed trust, no boundaries, self-protecting data

Governments wanting to take full advantage of cloud computing must completely rethink security, attendees of Trend Micro's Canberra Cloud Security Conference were told yesterday.

"It doesn't matter whose chart you look at, security tops the list of reasons why people are not moving to cloud," said Trevor Gerdes, VMware's senior systems engineer for security and compliance in Asia-Pacific and Japan.

IT managers are worried about controlling information access, governance, privacy and where the information is stored, he said. This is of particular concern in a virtualised environment — and virtualisation is at the heart of a true cloud strategy — because virtual machines can be copied and moved.

"That causes a problem, more than anything else, around security," Gerdes said. "If my security models are about my information being in this location, what happens when it's in a different location tomorrow? All my security models are now broken."

Policies can't be built around a specific IP address, for example, and must instead be translated into virtual policies that make sense even when the physical location is outside the organisation's direct control.

"When I don't have blue cables that create physical segmentation, how do I know that my policies are being adhered to?" Gerdes said.

"We've got to start taking those things that physically bind our environment, physically put up the walls around our environment, and make them virtual. Make them software constructs that can be moved from one location to another as easily as a virtual machine can."

Due diligence is key, according to Rob Livingstone, principal of Rob Livingstone Advisory Pty Ltd.

"The definition of cloud is, to a certain extent, opacity — and that includes to the perimeter," he said. "You could scale it up or down to anywhere."

"Provided you do extensive due diligence on your specific installation, for your specific requirements, and go deep behind the provider layer, and go through all the stack, and do your due diligence rigorously, that's where you'll find the black holes and the issues."

One difficulty for Australian government cloud users is the Defence Signals Directorate's prohibition of virtualisation across different security classification domains.

"I've got to put boundaries around my different security domains. And to really take advantage of cloud, you are going to have to maybe start looking to push the boundaries of that in the future," Gerdes said.

"Are we going to have, as an organisation, four different clouds that I'm going to subscribe to, to run different classifications of applications? Interesting conundrum."

Gerdes said that the UK issued guidance in September to allow data classified at levels below "protected" to co-exist on the same VMware platform, something he describes as a "significant milestone".

"If we can start building mixed-trust zones, we can start opening up the choices that are available to us," he said.

But according to Trend Micro's chief technical officer Raimund Genes, "Very soon we will not have boundaries any more [and] the data has to protect itself."

"I think it is unavoidable [although] in the government space you could stick to it longer," he said.

Genes also thinks it's "totally absurd" that companies and moving existing applications into the cloud as-in when the technology is at such an early stage of the hype cycle — although governments are less likely to do this.

"Somebody at the board decided, or the CIO, 'Hey, we could do it cheaper outside.' They just took their application from an internal data centre where they have been able to offer five-nines to Amazon Elastic Cloud. And then earlier this year Amazon had an outage and 'Oops, I lost all my data'," Genes said.

"It's not so much about putting the data into a cloud, it's about 'Is your application, is your business model, ready to support public cloud?'"

Tags: Canberra Cloud Security Conference, cloud computing, cloud security, government, security, trend micro, virtualisation

Comments

1

Peter Holland

Thu 08/03/2012 - 13:02

The big problem that is starting to be countered with respect to government engagement in the cloud is the retention of data in australia, instead of allowing it to pass off shore. Cloud, by definition, is everywhere, not one physical location. From this aspect, the government can ill afford to release sensitive or mundane data into a control free environment. The possibilities for misuse are immense.

There are other considerations with cloud. If there is a failure and the service is down, how can access to data be achieved? Baby steps are needed. Parallel hosting / cloud solutions (with local australian providers) may be the answer, but it is still a big unknown.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Users posting comments agree to the CSO comments policy.
Login or register to link comments to your user profile, or you may also post a comment without being logged in.
CSO Corporate Partners
  • FirEye
  • Clear Swift
  • Trend Micro
  • Sophos
  • NetIQ
rhs_login_lockGet exclusive access to CSO, invitation only events, reports & analysis.
CSO Directory

Web Gateway Security

Real-time Protection from Real-world Threats

Security Awareness Tip
Software security company www.clearswift.com gives some advice this holiday season to make sure employees don’t end up on Santa’s naughty list!


At a fundamental business level, social media is a useful additional tool for communicating and collaborating with customers, colleagues and new business prospects. From an HR point of view, the social web is not only useful for recruitment but also as a knowledge network. At an employee level, social media is changing the way we work: Employees increasingly expect to be able to access personal technology and services in the workplace. As the lines between work and home life blur, staff are looking for greater flexibility in their roles; working from home is an increasing trend, but so too is ‘home-ing from work’, where staff expect to be able to perform personal tasks at work.

But social media brings risk and reward to business in equal measure. Information security is a key concern: Many organisations view social media channels as yet another route along which sensitive data can escape from the business, whether accidentally or maliciously. On top of this, senior management may be concerned about the amount of time employees spend on social networks.

This cultural shift raises new questions about trust in the workplace, the balance of power in employer / employee relationship and levels of control over people and content.


Organisations using content and web security technology can manage the way their staff use email and the internet without having to resort to a default position of mistrust. With a whopping third of ANZ employers completely blocking social media access at work, there’s a real danger of throwing the benefits of collaboration out with the risks.


It doesn’t have to be that way.

Trust breeds responsibility: People underestimate the amount of company time they spend on personal browsing. Allow staff to view their own web usage and foster more responsible behaviour without undermining trust.


Know limits: Set clear limits on personal surfing and communicate them to users. Alert them when they are approaching their limit. Help your people to play by the rules.


Share the load: Spread responsibility for usage reporting among managers and department heads so everyone gets to see how their usage impacts on the rest of the organisation. This also gives managers greater control and visibility into usage.


Need to know: Yes, you need reports and visibility. What you don’t need is employee data becoming common knowledge. Access control means reporting can be adjusted on a need-to-know basis.


Security ABC Guides

7 Ways to Protect Your Business Printers

Can a hacker burn down your business by remotely setting one of your printers on fire? Researchers at Columbia University have recently proposed such a scenario, although HP quickly denied that it's possible. However, even if your printers can't be used as remote firestarters, there are many risks involved in networking a printer.