Shock analysis: most cybercriminals are stupid

"Patch," researcher advises, "Patch, patch, patch"
  • Stilgherrian (CSO Online (Australia))
  • — 15 November, 2011 10:20

Analysis of real-world internet traffic has revealed that everyday criminal malware is the most likely threat to businesses and individuals, not sophisticated worms like Stuxnet or advanced persistent threats (APTs) launched by nation states.

The Sourcefire Vulnerability Research Team (VRT) uses a honeypot network to capture more than a terabyte of malware-related traffic every day.

Analysis by senior researcher Alex Kirk shows that the vast majority of attacks are unsophisticated, often conducted by criminals with little technical knowledge using malware construction kits bought for around $100 from Russian suppliers.

"It's not to say that there isn't real, actual, state-sponsored infiltration and that there aren't actual APT attacks that really sneak in andy do nasty, horrible things. But those represent a tiny fraction of the malware that's out there," Kirk told CSO Online.

"Probably less that one percent of all attacks are actually properly 'sophisticated'," he said. "The reality of it is is that 90 percent or more of infections out in the wild are not using 0-day to get in. They're using perfectly patched, known vulnerabilities that there's public exploits for."

"Patch," Kirk said. "Patch, patch, patch. I cannot stress enough the importance of keeping your software up to date."

Kirk is "completely in agreement" with Australian Crime Commission chief John Lawlor's call for businesses and individuals to take more responsibility for their own security because traditional law enforcement can't keep up.

For example, some domains have been known to be running botnet command and control (C&C) servers for eighteen months or more without being taken down.

"One of those, ilo.brends.pl, has been happily distributing malicious binaries and running a C&C network for this entire time. I've spoken about it at multiple conferences around the world, I keep highlighting at as an example, and nobody's touching it," Kirk said.

"I'd love to go take this thing down, but I don't have the expertise to do that myself. I don't have the law enforcement contacts, and no-one ever responds."

Kirk will present his Malware Mythbusters research at Ruxcon in Melbourne this coming weekend.

Contact Stilgherrian at Stil@stilgherrian.com or follow him on Twitter at @stilgherrian

Tags: advanced persistent threats (APTs), Alex Kirk, cybercrime, cybercriminals, malware, Sourcefire Vulnerability Research Team (VRT), Stuxnet

Comments

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Users posting comments agree to the CSO comments policy.
Login or register to link comments to your user profile, or you may also post a comment without being logged in.
CSO Corporate Partners
  • FirEye
  • Clear Swift
  • Trend Micro
  • Sophos
  • NetIQ
rhs_login_lockGet exclusive access to CSO, invitation only events, reports & analysis.
CSO Directory

ZENworks® Endpoint Security Management

Get powerful mobile security capabilities, and protect the data the various mobile devices inside your organization.

Security Awareness Tip
Clearswift tips: Guidelines for introducing and policing an effective IT Policy

1. Make it clear that the policy is not about playing ‘Big Brother’ but to ensure the security of employees, company information and data and to safeguard the company’s reputation.
2. Invest time to get buy-in from managers and their teams.
3. Convey the message of flexibility – with regard to social media, it is not about blocking staff usage but working in everyone’s interests to ensure that threats are contained.
4. Introduce a regular company-wide training programme that everyone attends at regular intervals throughout the year, not merely as part of an induction programme.
5. Within the training programme make sure that there are specific examples to demonstrate each rule or regulation, and that there is a clear explanation of the dangers of casual or careless talk on social networking sites. Again use examples, employees need to understand the consequences of raising a throwaway comment that has negative connotations for the business, as much as they need to be aware of dangers of making a more direct but ill-considered attack on a competitor, regulator or even a fellow colleague. They need to be clearly advised on any impact on the company and/or legal action or inquires that may be raised as a result.
6. Alert employees to any changes in policy through regular clear communication.
7. Reinforce the operational policy guidelines regularly, cover everything from blogging to Facebook, LinkedIn and Twitter.
8. Ensure that the rules are fair and that they apply throughout the business.
9. Enforce the rules – if there is a deliberate or malicious contravening, disciplinary action needs to be taken. A policy isn’t worth having if it is seen to be lax and unenforced.
10. Review the policy regularly to ensure you keep up to date with new systems and technology.

Phil Vasic is Regional Director, APAC, at Clearswift, the software security company www.clearswift.com
Security ABC Guides

7 Ways to Protect Your Business Printers

Can a hacker burn down your business by remotely setting one of your printers on fire? Researchers at Columbia University have recently proposed such a scenario, although HP quickly denied that it's possible. However, even if your printers can't be used as remote firestarters, there are many risks involved in networking a printer.