Duqu, Son of Stuxnet, has arrived

New malware intended for espionage, targets Certificate Authorities
  • Stilgherrian (CSO Online (Australia))
  • — 19 October, 2011 07:28

The team behind Stuxnet, the complex malware used to attack Iran's nuclear program earlier this year, has produced another worm, dubbed "Duqu" by McAfee Labs.

"The threat that we call 'Duqu' is based on Stuxnet and it is very similar," wrote researchers Guilherme Venere and Peter Szor in a blog post describing the new threat published early this morning Australian time.

Duqu's mission? Espionage and targeted attacks against sites such as Certificate Authorities (CAs), the companies that counter-sign businesses' encryption keys to ensure their authenticity.

McAfee Labs advises CAs to carefully verify that their systems have not been affected by this threat.

"Only a few sites so far are known to be attacked by the code, and it does not have PLC [programmable logic controller] functionality like Stuxnet. Instead, the code which is delivered via exploitation, installs drivers and encrypted DLLs that function very similar to the original Stuxnet code," they wrote.

"In fact, the driver's code used for the injection attack is very similar to Stuxnet, as well as several encryption keys, and techniques that were used in Stuxnet."

Like Stuxnet, Duqu uses a stolen digital certificate purportedly from a Taiwanese company, in this case C-Media Corporation. Versign has now revoked the fake certificate.

"It was specially crafted to execute sophisticated attacks against key targets and has remote control functionality to install new code on the target, such as keyloggers, which can be used to further monitor all actions on systems including running processes, window messages, and so on," the researchers wrote.

"Furthermore, the keylogger component also contains functionallity to hide files with a user mode rootkit."

Duqu was designed to communicate with a command and control server in India. However that server's IP address has since been blacklisted by the internet service provider and no longer functions.

McAfee Labs had received the new malware kit from an independent team of researchers as part of an ongoing investigation. Apparently the creators of Duqu had access to the original Stuxnet source code, not just the reverse-engineered samples seen online.

Two different packages have been discovered so far, the key difference being that one is digitally signed with the fake C-Media Corporation certificate while the other is not.

Stilgherrian is attending the McAfee's Focus 11 security conference in Las Vegas as their guest.

Contact Stilgherrian at Stil@stilgherrian.com or follow him on Twitter at @stilgherrian

Tags: Certificate Authorities, duqu, mcafee labs, security, Stuxnet

Comments

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Users posting comments agree to the CSO comments policy.
Login or register to link comments to your user profile, or you may also post a comment without being logged in.
CSO Corporate Partners
  • FirEye
  • Clear Swift
  • Trend Micro
  • Sophos
  • NetIQ
rhs_login_lockGet exclusive access to CSO, invitation only events, reports & analysis.
CSO Directory

Email Security and Data Protection

Encrypt your sensitive email

Security Awareness Tip
Clearswift tips: Guidelines for introducing and policing an effective IT Policy

1. Make it clear that the policy is not about playing ‘Big Brother’ but to ensure the security of employees, company information and data and to safeguard the company’s reputation.
2. Invest time to get buy-in from managers and their teams.
3. Convey the message of flexibility – with regard to social media, it is not about blocking staff usage but working in everyone’s interests to ensure that threats are contained.
4. Introduce a regular company-wide training programme that everyone attends at regular intervals throughout the year, not merely as part of an induction programme.
5. Within the training programme make sure that there are specific examples to demonstrate each rule or regulation, and that there is a clear explanation of the dangers of casual or careless talk on social networking sites. Again use examples, employees need to understand the consequences of raising a throwaway comment that has negative connotations for the business, as much as they need to be aware of dangers of making a more direct but ill-considered attack on a competitor, regulator or even a fellow colleague. They need to be clearly advised on any impact on the company and/or legal action or inquires that may be raised as a result.
6. Alert employees to any changes in policy through regular clear communication.
7. Reinforce the operational policy guidelines regularly, cover everything from blogging to Facebook, LinkedIn and Twitter.
8. Ensure that the rules are fair and that they apply throughout the business.
9. Enforce the rules – if there is a deliberate or malicious contravening, disciplinary action needs to be taken. A policy isn’t worth having if it is seen to be lax and unenforced.
10. Review the policy regularly to ensure you keep up to date with new systems and technology.

Phil Vasic is Regional Director, APAC, at Clearswift, the software security company www.clearswift.com
Security ABC Guides

7 Ways to Protect Your Business Printers

Can a hacker burn down your business by remotely setting one of your printers on fire? Researchers at Columbia University have recently proposed such a scenario, although HP quickly denied that it's possible. However, even if your printers can't be used as remote firestarters, there are many risks involved in networking a printer.