Could Google pull an Apple on Motorola hardware?

Hardware-software integration could lead to secure Android smartphones
  • Stilgherrian (CSO Online (Australia))
  • — 16 August, 2011 13:27

Google's US$12.5 billion purchase of Motorola Mobility is being reported primarily in terms of access to patents and difficulty integrating the corporate cultures. But there's also a potential longer-term spin-off. Secure Android smartphones.

Motorola's patents are certainly at the core of the deal. Around 24,500 of them.

"Our acquisition of Motorola will increase competition by strengthening Google's patent portfolio, which will enable us to better protect Android from anti-competitive threats from Microsoft, Apple and other companies," wrote Google CEO Larry Page.

The deal also gives Google a manufacturing arm.

Gartner places Motorola Mobility as the world's eight largest phone manufacturer. Its market share has declined from 18.4 percent back in 2007 to a mere 2.4 percent today.

But that relatively small size isn't necessarily a limitation. Motorola is a company with a strong tradition of innovation and quality engineering -- although they're probably more a follow-the-procedure shop than hyper-innovative Google. They can grow again.

The potential is there for tighter integration between hardware and software development.

Think iPad. Think Apple.

"They've done a wonderful, wonderful design, and they've built a system that's relatively open, in the sense that you can have new apps on there, but at the same time has some secure features," said Dr Paul Nielsen, director and chief executive officer of the Software Engineering Institute at Carnegie Mellon University.

"They've actually had a better experience recently than the Android systems, which are even more open but have almost no security on them, and we've seen some cases already of malware being deployed on Android systems," Nielsen told CSO Online recently.

Motorola is a perfect fit for this strategy.

Motorola Mobility was only spun off from Motorola Inc in January this year, and Motorola Inc has a tradition of providing secure communications systems for government, military, law enforcement and emergency services customers stretching back to World War II -- although admittedly much of the security expertise would have gone to General Dynamics a decade ago when Motorola sold that part of its business, which became GD Decision Systems and then part of General Dynamics C4 Systems.

Still, positive workplace cultures can be slow to fade.

The other key Android smartphone manufacturers -- Samsung, Sony Ericsson, LG and HTC -- are all consumer electronics companies with nothing like Motorola's security tradition.

Either way, being owned by Google gives Motorola Mobility a distinct advantage over those four and the rest of the Android licensees -- there's 38 in all. You need no further proof than the rather forced statements the key four have made, all variations on "We welcome Google‘s commitment to defending Android and its partners."

I, for one, welcome our new Android overlords.

And as one final clue, The Wall Street Journal reports that Motorola recently acquired Three Laws Mobility, a startup founded by former Google employees. It makes security software for Android devices.

Tags: acquisition, Google, Motorola, News, security, speculation

Comments

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Users posting comments agree to the CSO comments policy.
Login or register to link comments to your user profile, or you may also post a comment without being logged in.
CSO Corporate Partners
  • FirEye
  • Clear Swift
  • Trend Micro
  • Sophos
  • NetIQ
rhs_login_lockGet exclusive access to CSO, invitation only events, reports & analysis.
CSO Directory

Web Aplication Security

Safeguard your websites against cyber attacks and data loss.

Security Awareness Tip
Software security company www.clearswift.com gives some advice this holiday season to make sure employees don’t end up on Santa’s naughty list!


At a fundamental business level, social media is a useful additional tool for communicating and collaborating with customers, colleagues and new business prospects. From an HR point of view, the social web is not only useful for recruitment but also as a knowledge network. At an employee level, social media is changing the way we work: Employees increasingly expect to be able to access personal technology and services in the workplace. As the lines between work and home life blur, staff are looking for greater flexibility in their roles; working from home is an increasing trend, but so too is ‘home-ing from work’, where staff expect to be able to perform personal tasks at work.

But social media brings risk and reward to business in equal measure. Information security is a key concern: Many organisations view social media channels as yet another route along which sensitive data can escape from the business, whether accidentally or maliciously. On top of this, senior management may be concerned about the amount of time employees spend on social networks.

This cultural shift raises new questions about trust in the workplace, the balance of power in employer / employee relationship and levels of control over people and content.


Organisations using content and web security technology can manage the way their staff use email and the internet without having to resort to a default position of mistrust. With a whopping third of ANZ employers completely blocking social media access at work, there’s a real danger of throwing the benefits of collaboration out with the risks.


It doesn’t have to be that way.

Trust breeds responsibility: People underestimate the amount of company time they spend on personal browsing. Allow staff to view their own web usage and foster more responsible behaviour without undermining trust.


Know limits: Set clear limits on personal surfing and communicate them to users. Alert them when they are approaching their limit. Help your people to play by the rules.


Share the load: Spread responsibility for usage reporting among managers and department heads so everyone gets to see how their usage impacts on the rest of the organisation. This also gives managers greater control and visibility into usage.


Need to know: Yes, you need reports and visibility. What you don’t need is employee data becoming common knowledge. Access control means reporting can be adjusted on a need-to-know basis.


Security ABC Guides

7 Ways to Protect Your Business Printers

Can a hacker burn down your business by remotely setting one of your printers on fire? Researchers at Columbia University have recently proposed such a scenario, although HP quickly denied that it's possible. However, even if your printers can't be used as remote firestarters, there are many risks involved in networking a printer.