Siemens commits "basic security errors": Byres

"The vulnerabilities were far worse than I ever imagined"
  • Stilgherrian (CSO Online (Australia))
  • — 08 August, 2011 06:30

Leading US critical infrastructure security consultant Eric Byres has slammed security practices at Siemens following the demonstration of serious security vulnerabilities in their S7 programmable logic controllers (PLCs) at Black Hat 2011.

"To me the most serious and inexcusable security hole is a hardcoded username (Basisk) and password (Basisk) that Siemens engineers had left in many versions of firmware on the S7-300 PLC," Byres writes at his Practical SCADA Security Blog.

Security researcher Dillon Beresford, who discovered the flaws, said he could log into the PLCs via telnet and FTP and then dump memory, delete files and execute commands.

"Letting unnecessary services run on a PLC and the use of hardcoded passwords are both basic security errors. This should have never been allowed through the Siemens development and Quality Assurance process," Byres writes.

Siemens’ commitment to their customers’ security is "abominable", according to Byres.

"What is really sad is that Siemens clearly knew of the hard-coded password vulnerability at least a year ago. Yet they did nothing to address it. They did not create a patch for their users. They did not advise their customers in any way," he writes.

"Hiding known vulnerabilities from your customers for a year and then not preparing even a basic patch or mitigation plan is inexcusable."

Byres says customers should demand to see evidence that vendors have implemented a security development lifecycle (SDL) process, which integrates the consideration of security issues into every aspect of software development.

The SDL model was developed by Microsoft in 2004 as part of their Trustworthy Computing initiative in the wake of a series of high-profile Windows security problems in previous years. SDL is credited with the vast improvement of security in later products such as Microsoft Office 2010 and Windows 7.

Contact Stilgherrian at stil@stilgherrian.com, or follow him on Twitter at @stilgherrian.

Tags: Basisk, black Hat 2011, Dillon Beresford, Eric Byres, Microsoft, News, S7 programmable logic controllers (PLCs), SDL model, security, security development lifecycle (SDL), security vulnerabilities, siemens

Comments

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Users posting comments agree to the CSO comments policy.
Login or register to link comments to your user profile, or you may also post a comment without being logged in.
CSO Corporate Partners
  • FirEye
  • Clear Swift
  • Trend Micro
  • Sophos
  • NetIQ
rhs_login_lockGet exclusive access to CSO, invitation only events, reports & analysis.
CSO Directory

Audit Management Solutions

Manage the complete audit lifecycle from audit universe identification and risk assessment to management/board reporting and quality assurance.

Security Awareness Tip
Software security company www.clearswift.com gives some advice this holiday season to make sure employees don’t end up on Santa’s naughty list!


At a fundamental business level, social media is a useful additional tool for communicating and collaborating with customers, colleagues and new business prospects. From an HR point of view, the social web is not only useful for recruitment but also as a knowledge network. At an employee level, social media is changing the way we work: Employees increasingly expect to be able to access personal technology and services in the workplace. As the lines between work and home life blur, staff are looking for greater flexibility in their roles; working from home is an increasing trend, but so too is ‘home-ing from work’, where staff expect to be able to perform personal tasks at work.

But social media brings risk and reward to business in equal measure. Information security is a key concern: Many organisations view social media channels as yet another route along which sensitive data can escape from the business, whether accidentally or maliciously. On top of this, senior management may be concerned about the amount of time employees spend on social networks.

This cultural shift raises new questions about trust in the workplace, the balance of power in employer / employee relationship and levels of control over people and content.


Organisations using content and web security technology can manage the way their staff use email and the internet without having to resort to a default position of mistrust. With a whopping third of ANZ employers completely blocking social media access at work, there’s a real danger of throwing the benefits of collaboration out with the risks.


It doesn’t have to be that way.

Trust breeds responsibility: People underestimate the amount of company time they spend on personal browsing. Allow staff to view their own web usage and foster more responsible behaviour without undermining trust.


Know limits: Set clear limits on personal surfing and communicate them to users. Alert them when they are approaching their limit. Help your people to play by the rules.


Share the load: Spread responsibility for usage reporting among managers and department heads so everyone gets to see how their usage impacts on the rest of the organisation. This also gives managers greater control and visibility into usage.


Need to know: Yes, you need reports and visibility. What you don’t need is employee data becoming common knowledge. Access control means reporting can be adjusted on a need-to-know basis.


Security ABC Guides

7 Ways to Protect Your Business Printers

Can a hacker burn down your business by remotely setting one of your printers on fire? Researchers at Columbia University have recently proposed such a scenario, although HP quickly denied that it's possible. However, even if your printers can't be used as remote firestarters, there are many risks involved in networking a printer.