Australia to consider right-to-privacy law

Privacy a "defining issue of the modern era", says Minister
  • Stilgherrian (CSO Online (Australia))
  • — 21 July, 2011 10:30

In the wake of the UK's News of the World voicemail scandal, the Australian government announced today that it will consult the public on legislating for a right to privacy.

"Right now there is no general right to privacy in Australia, and that means there's no certainty for anyone wanting to sue for an invasion of their privacy," said the Minister for Privacy, Brendan O'Connor, in a media release.

Australia does have some laws to deal with certain privacy breaches. For example, the Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Act (Cth) 1979 makes a crime of phone tapping and other misuse of communications services. Privacy Act 1988 (Cth) and equivalent state laws cover individuals' privacy in certain situation, such as when doing business.

"The News of the World scandal and other recent mass breaches of privacy, both at home and abroad, have put the spotlight on whether there should be such a right," O'Connor said.

The spotlight was also put on Australians' lack of right to privacy three years ago.

In August 2008 the Australian Law Reform Commission (ALRC) tabled the report For Your Information: Australian Privacy Law and Practice. This report resulted from a comprehensive 28-month inquiry into the effectiveness of the Privacy Act and other laws in protecting privacy in Australia. It made 295 recommendations for reform.

"Federal legislation should provide for a statutory cause of action for a serious invasion of privacy. The Act should contain a non-exhaustive list of the types of invasion that fall within the cause of action," said Recommendation 74-1.

Examples of a serious invasion of privacy would be when there has been interference with an individual’s home or family life; when an individual has been subjected to unauthorised surveillance; when an individual’s correspondence or private written, oral or electronic communication has been interfered with, misused or disclosed; or when sensitive facts relating to an individual’s private life have been disclosed.

The report also recommended mandatory data breach notification laws.

When the 2008 ALRC report was released the then Special Minister for State, Senator John Faulkner, announced that the government would respond two stages. The first stage of the response [PDF] addresses 197 of the 295 recommendations.

An exposure draft of new Australian Privacy Principles (APP) was prepared in 2010, and the Senate Finance and Public Administration Legislation Committee reported on the draft [PDF] APPs in June 2011.

A public issues paper will be issued "soon", said today's media release. A period of public consultation will follow.

"Privacy is emerging as a defining issue of the modern era, especially as new technology provides more opportunities for communication, but also new challenges to privacy," O'Connor said.

 

Contact Stilgherrian at stil@stilgherrian.com, or follow him on Twitter at @stilgherrian.
 
 
 

Tags: Australian Government, Australian Law Reform Commission (ALRC), Federal legislation, News of the World, privacy, Senator john Faulkner

Comments

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Users posting comments agree to the CSO comments policy.
Login or register to link comments to your user profile, or you may also post a comment without being logged in.
CSO Corporate Partners
  • FirEye
  • Clear Swift
  • Trend Micro
  • Sophos
  • NetIQ
rhs_login_lockGet exclusive access to CSO, invitation only events, reports & analysis.
CSO Directory

Business Continuity Management Solutions

Automate business-continuity and disaster-recovery planning and enable crisis management in one solution.

more »

Submit your own security event

Submit your training courses

Security Awareness Tip
Software security company www.clearswift.com gives some advice this holiday season to make sure employees don’t end up on Santa’s naughty list!


At a fundamental business level, social media is a useful additional tool for communicating and collaborating with customers, colleagues and new business prospects. From an HR point of view, the social web is not only useful for recruitment but also as a knowledge network. At an employee level, social media is changing the way we work: Employees increasingly expect to be able to access personal technology and services in the workplace. As the lines between work and home life blur, staff are looking for greater flexibility in their roles; working from home is an increasing trend, but so too is ‘home-ing from work’, where staff expect to be able to perform personal tasks at work.

But social media brings risk and reward to business in equal measure. Information security is a key concern: Many organisations view social media channels as yet another route along which sensitive data can escape from the business, whether accidentally or maliciously. On top of this, senior management may be concerned about the amount of time employees spend on social networks.

This cultural shift raises new questions about trust in the workplace, the balance of power in employer / employee relationship and levels of control over people and content.


Organisations using content and web security technology can manage the way their staff use email and the internet without having to resort to a default position of mistrust. With a whopping third of ANZ employers completely blocking social media access at work, there’s a real danger of throwing the benefits of collaboration out with the risks.


It doesn’t have to be that way.

Trust breeds responsibility: People underestimate the amount of company time they spend on personal browsing. Allow staff to view their own web usage and foster more responsible behaviour without undermining trust.


Know limits: Set clear limits on personal surfing and communicate them to users. Alert them when they are approaching their limit. Help your people to play by the rules.


Share the load: Spread responsibility for usage reporting among managers and department heads so everyone gets to see how their usage impacts on the rest of the organisation. This also gives managers greater control and visibility into usage.


Need to know: Yes, you need reports and visibility. What you don’t need is employee data becoming common knowledge. Access control means reporting can be adjusted on a need-to-know basis.


Security ABC Guides

7 Ways to Protect Your Business Printers

Can a hacker burn down your business by remotely setting one of your printers on fire? Researchers at Columbia University have recently proposed such a scenario, although HP quickly denied that it's possible. However, even if your printers can't be used as remote firestarters, there are many risks involved in networking a printer.

Read More
more »