Drug spam rules, thanks to WikiPharmacy: Symantec

The new fake online pharmacy brand WikiPharmacy is to blame, says Symantec.
  • Stilgherrian (CSO Online (Australia))
  • — 01 July, 2011 09:40
Declining spam: global daily spam volume from 15 June 2010 to 14 June 2011 (Source: Symantec Intelligence Report, June 2011)

Declining spam: global daily spam volume from 15 June 2010 to 14 June 2011 (Source: Symantec Intelligence Report, June 2011)

  • Declining spam: global daily spam volume from 15 June 2010 to 14 June 2011 (Source: Symantec Intelligence Report, June 2011)
  • Top ten spambots compared, since March 2011 (Source: Symantec Intelligence Report, June 2011)

 

Advertising for pharmaceuticals is still the most common type of spam globally, despite a 24 percentage point drop in share since the end of 2010. The new fake online pharmacy brand WikiPharmacy is to blame, says Symantec.
 
Towards the end of 2010, advertising for pharmaceutical products accounted for 64 percent of all spam, according to research published in the June 2011 Symantec Intelligence Report. That included the vast majority of the up to 30 billion emails sent daily from the largest and most active spam-sending botnet, Rustock.
 
Spamit, one of the main affiliate websites through which pharmaceutical spam was being promoted, was shut down in September 2010. As a result, Rustock lost an important source of its work, sometimes suffering outages where very little or even no spam was sent from its bots -- although the longest outage was less that 48 hours.
 
Then in March 2011, the Rustock botnet was taken down by Operation b107, a coordinated action led by Microsoft.
 
"Global spam has generally been falling since the shutdown of the Spamit affiliate website in late September 2010," wrote report editor Paul Wood, senior intelligence analyst with Symantec.cloud. The takedown of Rustock accelerated the decline.
 
"Spam volumes have never quite recovered," Wood said. In June 2011, pharmaceutical spam is just 40% of the total, although still the biggest category, followed by dating, sex and adult-related at 19 percent, and watches and jewellery at 17.5 percent.
 
A new spam tactic, identified by Symantec Intelligence last month, is to use the "Wiki" prefix in the promotion of fake pharmaceutical products relating to a new pharmacy brand, WikiPharmacy.
 
The “Subject:” line in these attacks contains randomised text, with real-world examples including "yWIKIg", "hWikiPharmacyl" and "oWikiPharmacyp".
 
"The volume of spam in this latest attack is quite high. Needless to say is that the popularity of the wiki- name in a number of high-profile Web sites is being exploited here, and users must be very careful not to enter personal details on these fake sites," says the report.
 
Overall, spam is now at its lowest level since the November 2008 takedown of McColo, the California-based ISP that hosted the command and control channels for a number of major botnets. But despite the successes, in June 2011 spam still constituted 72.9 percent of all email globally, and 70.4 percent in Australia.
 
The June 2011 Symantec Intelligence Report, which is based on data collected in May and June, combines the research and analysis streams previously published separately in the Symantec.cloud MessageLabs Intelligence Report and the Symantec State of Spam & Phishing Report.
 
 
 

Tags: botnets, exploits, McCol, News, Rustock botnet, security, spam, symantec, Symantec intelligence report, Wiki, wikipharamcy

Comments

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Users posting comments agree to the CSO comments policy.
Login or register to link comments to your user profile, or you may also post a comment without being logged in.
CSO Corporate Partners
  • FirEye
  • Clear Swift
  • Trend Micro
  • Sophos
  • NetIQ
rhs_login_lockGet exclusive access to CSO, invitation only events, reports & analysis.
CSO Directory

Sophos SafeGuard Enterprise

Your central key for data protection

Security Awareness Tip
Clearswift tips: Guidelines for introducing and policing an effective IT Policy

1. Make it clear that the policy is not about playing ‘Big Brother’ but to ensure the security of employees, company information and data and to safeguard the company’s reputation.
2. Invest time to get buy-in from managers and their teams.
3. Convey the message of flexibility – with regard to social media, it is not about blocking staff usage but working in everyone’s interests to ensure that threats are contained.
4. Introduce a regular company-wide training programme that everyone attends at regular intervals throughout the year, not merely as part of an induction programme.
5. Within the training programme make sure that there are specific examples to demonstrate each rule or regulation, and that there is a clear explanation of the dangers of casual or careless talk on social networking sites. Again use examples, employees need to understand the consequences of raising a throwaway comment that has negative connotations for the business, as much as they need to be aware of dangers of making a more direct but ill-considered attack on a competitor, regulator or even a fellow colleague. They need to be clearly advised on any impact on the company and/or legal action or inquires that may be raised as a result.
6. Alert employees to any changes in policy through regular clear communication.
7. Reinforce the operational policy guidelines regularly, cover everything from blogging to Facebook, LinkedIn and Twitter.
8. Ensure that the rules are fair and that they apply throughout the business.
9. Enforce the rules – if there is a deliberate or malicious contravening, disciplinary action needs to be taken. A policy isn’t worth having if it is seen to be lax and unenforced.
10. Review the policy regularly to ensure you keep up to date with new systems and technology.

Phil Vasic is Regional Director, APAC, at Clearswift, the software security company www.clearswift.com
Security ABC Guides

7 Ways to Protect Your Business Printers

Can a hacker burn down your business by remotely setting one of your printers on fire? Researchers at Columbia University have recently proposed such a scenario, although HP quickly denied that it's possible. However, even if your printers can't be used as remote firestarters, there are many risks involved in networking a printer.