Cyber security Tsar needed to lift Australia's defences?

Symantec global CIO David Thompson suggests a US-style cybersecurity role could help prevent attacks like Anonymous' recent DDoS attack on Prime Minster's Web site.

The appointment of a US-style cybersecurity tsar could be of major benefit to the Australian Government as it looks to increase the security of government infrastructure and data, according to the global CIO of security company Symantec.

Speaking with CIO, David Thompson, in Sydney for a series of customer events, said initiatives taken by the Obama administration around increasing cybersecurity could be modelled in Australia.

“The president of the United States has noted an increase in cyber crime and noted it as a top initiative; which is a significant step forward,” Thompson said. “The other thing he has done of unique value is to appoint a cyber tsar responsible for coordinating all efforts, spending and initiatives around protecting US infrastructure.

“That is something that can be noted around the world -- government leaders need to take responsibility for making [security] a top priority and protecting their infrastructure. Also appointing individuals to head those initiatives up, otherwise your efforts are spread so thin across so many areas that your really don’t get the value. It’s an area that needs increased focus, but also increased spending to secure and manage our government entities.”

The comments follow a DDoS attack on the prime minister’s site -- pm.gov.au -- last night by the protest group Anonymous.

In its submission to the House of Representatives Standing Committee on Communications New Inquiry into Cyber crime, Microsoft Australia said trends in security pointed to the need for a comprehensive and coordinated national strategy around cyber crime as well as greater Government-to-Government collaboration on cross-jurisdictional crime.

"When one recognises the breadth of the challenge and the need for a massively decentralized but coordinated response among the federal, state and territory agencies, we believe that the Committee should consider whether or not Australia’s national cyber security strategy and its implementatin should be led by a single coordinating authority at the highest Executive level, like the Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet or through an appointed “cyber security czar”," the submission reads.

"As the Committee would be aware, the US is moving to a similar model, where their national cyber security strategy will be led and coordinated by the White House... So too, we need to better understand the threat landscape and to evolve and focus the public-private partnership model as well as international collaboration.”

The company also argues for a legislative model designed to ensure that greater regulation, if enacted, protects innovation while providing appropriate government oversight of cybersecurity issues.

“Finally, Microsoft maintains that the Internet needs an appropriately deployed identity meta-system if we are to make the Internet dramatically more secure but protect important social values, such as privacy and free speech.”

Join the CSO newsletter!

Error: Please check your email address.

Tags auscertsymantecsecurityddosNetChoiceMicrosoftcyber security

More about Australian Computer Emergency Response TeamCERT AustraliaComputer Emergency Response TeamIngram MicroMicrosoftNetChoiceSymantec

Show Comments

Featured Whitepapers

Editor's Recommendations

Solution Centres

Stories by Tim Lohman

Latest Videos

More videos

Blog Posts