Friday | 10 July, 2009
CSO
Aussies follow Canadian lead on data breach guide
Canadian data breach notification guidelines arrive down under

"We've been pushing for notification requirements for years, because it's obvious to me and my colleagues that, by and large, corporations are not doing as much as they should be to secure the personal information in their possession," Pippa Lawson, executive director at CIPPIC, told ComputerWorld Canada earlier this year. "Our conclusion from years of research is that the market does not provide efficient incentives for effective security precautions, because in most cases, companies can hide the breaches and they are never publicly known about."

Lawson said that while the government's interest in drafting better data breach notification laws is positive, Ottawa needs to take it a step further and require mandatory public reporting as well.

"There's two ways that you can create incentives for companies to take strong security measures: one is to make them pay financially through penalties and fines, and two is to give them bad publicity that can be even more costly," Lawson said. "If there is a real risk of negative publicity for these companies, the CEOs will make sure that they put more resources into security."

David Senf, director of security and software research at Toronto-based IDC Canada Ltd., said Canada would benefit greatly from similar privacy legislation passed in California, which mandates organizations to reveal to customers that personal data has been compromised.

"Organizations in this country don't fear the repercussions of PIPEDA," Senf said earlier this year. "Stronger legislation will go a long way in convincing organizations to tighten up security for better privacy protection."

Cavoukian, however, disagreed on taking such a punitive approach. As a regulator, she said, her concern is to ensure when something happens that it's addressed immediately and as quickly as possible to benefit the affected individuals.

"You can almost take as a given that over time, virtually every company is going to make an oversight or a mistake and have some kind of data breach," Cavoukian said. "My experience in working with organizations is that as soon as they know there's a breach, they're really motivated to cure the harm and prevent it. If you create a database of who did what and how many times they did it, I just don't know how effective it would be."

More about Lawson, ACT, IDC

Comments

Post new comment

Login or register to link comments to your user profile, or you may also post a comment without being logged in.
The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Enter the fully qualified URL, eg. http://www.example.com/
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

Additional Resources
Newsletter Subscription
Sign up for our CSO Online newsletters!
RSS Feeds
Syndicate content Syndicate content
 
Whitepaper

The business justification for data security

In the information security world we face two major types of threats: "noisy" threats which directly interfere with our ability to do business and "quiet" threats which cause real damage, but don't necessarily prevent people from doing their jobs. Read on to discover how to combat both types of threats and to justify the use of data security within your business.

Sponsored Links