Friday | 10 July, 2009
CSO
Ten dangerous claims about smartphone security
Our columnist sees Barack Obama with that BlackBerry and shudders
Jon Espenschied (Computerworld) 27/03/2007 15:04:37

5. E-mails and messages are secure from prying eyes.

Whoever controls your smart phone application server has access to your data. While smart phone service providers and software packages all provide a modicum of access control, administrators with root access can always get at your information if they want.

While your corporate IT department might not be spying on Marketing on behalf of Finance, Obama might want to take note that congressional IT organizations that serve both Democratic and Republican Senators have had several incidents involving e-mail disclosures to other parties. In the midst of the Mark Foley scandal, it was interesting to note a person described in the media as a "Democratic operative" was able to retrieve and forward messages sent months earlier from a Republican representative's smart phone.

Know where messages and other data reside when sent from a smart phone. If service is provided by a neutral vendor, make sure you have a service level agreement that considers whether your data may be commingled with other businesses -- possibly your competitors -- on the same systems. Those with specific competitive concerns ought to run their own systems using their own administrative staff. Obama would do well to use a device controlled by the Democratic National Committee or his own campaign, rather than one managed by Senate IT staff and easily-influenced pages.

6. Using a mobile phone constitutes out-of-band communication.

A phone call over a landline used to be an acceptable method for communicating out-of-band administrative information. For example, a system administrator might call you back at your desk to verbally give you a new password (which you then changed, right?), This worked because the desk phone was isolated from the network and system resources to which you were being given access.

Not so anymore. If you lose your smart phone and IT calls you back on that mobile number to confirm the trouble ticket, is it a meaningful method of verifying the identity or location of the person who answers? Of course not. Possession of the number means little if anything anymore, especially since most phones will allow answering of an incoming call even when locked.

IT help desks should cross callbacks off the list of acceptable methods of identity verification for anything to do with mobile devices or remote access. The new Bluetooth BlackBerry smartcard reader is a viable option for those who need to authenticate using something they possess, and while similar options lag a little on other platforms, they are available.

Comments

Post new comment

Login or register to link comments to your user profile, or you may also post a comment without being logged in.
The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Enter the fully qualified URL, eg. http://www.example.com/
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

Additional Resources
Newsletter Subscription
Sign up for our CSO Online newsletters!
RSS Feeds
Syndicate content
 
Whitepaper

State of Internet Security

Spyware, viruses and other malware transported via Web sites represent the most serious data threat to companies today. Read on find out how you can appropriately leverage technology and appropriate business technologies to protect your business.

Sponsored Links