Friday | 10 July, 2009
CSO
DOE's Federated Model aims to identify security threats

Argonne National Laboratory, a division of the Department of Energy (DOE) operated out of the University of Chicago, is spearheading an effort to collect information about cyber security events that is beginning to gain steam.

Called The Federated Model, this information-sharing initiative among government, universities, and research labs began last September and currently has about half a dozen active members, says Scott Pinkerton, manager of network services for the lab in DuPage County, Ill.

The initiative is open to any organization wanting to share details, or even just view information, regarding attempts by different IP addresses to access networks and how organizations have responded to these attempts, in an effort to spot patterns of malicious behavior and proactively block security threats, says Pinkerton.

For example, if one member of the Federated Model suffers an attack from a certain IP address, another member may be able to block that IP address from accessing its network and thwart a second attack, he says.

"We're reinforcing the idea that we could be smarter, and more prepared," Pinkerton says. While the number of members is growing, Pinkerton says The Federated Model hasn't yet hit critical mass.

Pinkerton discussed The Federated Model's progress at Network World's IT Roadmap conference held in Chicago late last month during a session on security. He stressed the importance of monitoring NetFlow data to search for zero-day attack traffic patterns, a practice his department engages in. NetFlow is a Cisco technology for storing traffic flow histories on routers and switches.

Argonne has taken on the development of The Federated Model's repository and laid out specifications to be used for submitting and accessing information. Following IETF standards, data is submitted in XML format that is encrypted. The lab is working on adding features, such as an RSS feed that would tell members when new information has been added to the repository, Pinkerton says.

What's valuable about this data is not only learning what IP addresses are doing, but what organizations are doing in response to potential threats, says Tami Martin, intrusion detection systems engineer with Argonne. "You're learning the reactive measures other sites are taking," she says. "Also of intrinsic value is [learning] the severity of the action taken."

Eventually, members could get to the point where they can completely thwart an attack by following the actions of a trusted member, says Pinkerton.

Comments

Post new comment

Login or register to link comments to your user profile, or you may also post a comment without being logged in.
The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Enter the fully qualified URL, eg. http://www.example.com/
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

Syndicate content
 
Whitepaper

The business justification for data security

In the information security world we face two major types of threats: "noisy" threats which directly interfere with our ability to do business and "quiet" threats which cause real damage, but don't necessarily prevent people from doing their jobs. Read on to discover how to combat both types of threats and to justify the use of data security within your business.

Sponsored Links