Tuesday | 16 March, 2010
CSO
Virtual servers: More or less secure?
Security measures need to be dynamic and flexible

Virtualization is quickly being adopted in many different industries. As virtual machines move from testing and development roles into production, security becomes ever more important. Virtual servers are no less secure than regular servers, and may provide additional security by compartmentalizing applications.

However, when companies deploy virtual servers in production they change their operational practices to take advantage of the flexibility of virtualization. Servers are pooled together, provisioned and deployed automatically from a handful of standardized operating system images and moved around dynamically in response to changes in demand or maintenance needs. These operational practices require a new approach to security.

In a research benchmark conducted in the first quarter of 2007 I asked IT executives how they treat virtual servers from a security perspective. Although the majority of participants are not yet running production systems on virtual servers, many say they plan to do so. When asked how they secure their virtual servers, participants say they treat them like physical servers with respect to security -- having the same kinds of agents running on the virtual hosts as on the physical ones, and using virtual LANs (VLAN) to segment virtual servers within the data center.

To exploit virtualization to its fullest and become vastly more agile in response to changing business requirements and opportunities, IT will need to do considerably more than treat virtual servers like really thin, densely stackable physical servers.

Corporate security teams will have to embrace security tools that can fully cope with servers that move from place to place within a data center or among data centers, that can change media access control and IP addresses along the way, and that may exist for only a few minutes at a time if they are being created in response to changing workloads. And while VLANs are a good short-gap measure, from a management perspective they can quickly turn into VLAN-spaghetti in a dynamic environment.

Virtual servers can be treated just like thin, densely stacked servers. But that misses the point: virtualization frees the server from its physical "body" and gives it flexibility and portability. To take advantage of these traits we have to adopt security measures that also are dynamic and flexible. Otherwise, we are hobbling our virtualization strategy because of inadequate security.

Comments

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

Enter the fully qualified URL, eg. http://www.example.com/
Users posting comments agree to the CSO Online comments policy.
Login or register to link comments to your user profile, or you may also post a comment without being logged in.
Additional Resources
Newsletter Subscription
Sign up for our CSO Online newsletters!
RSS Feeds
Syndicate content
 
Whitepaper

Making the move to Ethernet | A DECISION GUIDE

While enterprises today need higher bandwidth, there is increasing demand for solutions that can provide scalability, performance, simplicity and control at lower costs. Get the best of both worlds - read about Ethernet adoption today.

Sponsored Links